<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Great War Fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Carol Anne Duffy&#8217;s &#8216;Last Post&#8217; by George Simmers</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/carol-anne-duffys-last-post/#comment-35844</link>
		<dc:creator>George Simmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1446#comment-35844</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about Horace, of course, but Duffy&#039;s first lines quote Owen, so it&#039;s appropriate to link Dulce et decorum to him, too.

One thing I wonder. Owen wrote D et D in late 1917. I get the impression that by this time the ironic contrast between Horace&#039;s idealistic slogan and muddy reality had become quite a common trope in war literature. So by linking the two, was Owen actually following the trend?
Still, he does it better than anyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about Horace, of course, but Duffy&#8217;s first lines quote Owen, so it&#8217;s appropriate to link Dulce et decorum to him, too.</p>
<p>One thing I wonder. Owen wrote D et D in late 1917. I get the impression that by this time the ironic contrast between Horace&#8217;s idealistic slogan and muddy reality had become quite a common trope in war literature. So by linking the two, was Owen actually following the trend?<br />
Still, he does it better than anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carol Anne Duffy&#8217;s &#8216;Last Post&#8217; by MARK WOOD</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/carol-anne-duffys-last-post/#comment-35843</link>
		<dc:creator>MARK WOOD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1446#comment-35843</guid>
		<description>I think you may have been a little unfair in referring to (mis(use of Owen&#039;s poetry. &quot;Dulce et decorum est&quot; actually goes back much further (to Horace??). Owen was simply using a phrase already well-used by the 19th Century. Duffy&#039;s simply continuing the tradition!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may have been a little unfair in referring to (mis(use of Owen&#8217;s poetry. &#8220;Dulce et decorum est&#8221; actually goes back much further (to Horace??). Owen was simply using a phrase already well-used by the 19th Century. Duffy&#8217;s simply continuing the tradition!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pretty Lady by George Simmers</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/the-pretty-lady/#comment-35841</link>
		<dc:creator>George Simmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1611#comment-35841</guid>
		<description>And there&#039;s also a Galsworthy story, Defeat (written 1916, published after the War) which takes a sympathetic, non-moralistic look at a prostitute (German pretending to be Russian) and her British officer customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there&#8217;s also a Galsworthy story, Defeat (written 1916, published after the War) which takes a sympathetic, non-moralistic look at a prostitute (German pretending to be Russian) and her British officer customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pretty Lady by Roger</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/the-pretty-lady/#comment-35838</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1611#comment-35838</guid>
		<description>‘the extreme calm with which Christine, G.J. and the author accept her profession is unusual in English fiction, to say the least.’
A contemporary of Bennett, R. B. Cunninghame Graham takes a similar attitude in some of his short stories. In his case the woman is French, which- as with Bennett- may be meant to point out that they order these things better in France. In Ford&#039;s Last Post Tietjen&#039;s elder brother takes a French ballet-dancer as his mistress: the relationship begins by being entirely commercial, but that does not stop it becoming an emotional commitment by both people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘the extreme calm with which Christine, G.J. and the author accept her profession is unusual in English fiction, to say the least.’<br />
A contemporary of Bennett, R. B. Cunninghame Graham takes a similar attitude in some of his short stories. In his case the woman is French, which- as with Bennett- may be meant to point out that they order these things better in France. In Ford&#8217;s Last Post Tietjen&#8217;s elder brother takes a French ballet-dancer as his mistress: the relationship begins by being entirely commercial, but that does not stop it becoming an emotional commitment by both people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posterity by Etl World News &#124; The test of time?</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/posterity/#comment-35834</link>
		<dc:creator>Etl World News &#124; The test of time?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1551#comment-35834</guid>
		<description>[...] love Galsworthy and for that matter Wells.&#160; Here is the article.&#160; Here is further commentary.&#160; By the way, no one back then voted for Agatha Christie, who is now probably the most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love Galsworthy and for that matter Wells.&#160; Here is the article.&#160; Here is further commentary.&#160; By the way, no one back then voted for Agatha Christie, who is now probably the most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posterity by George Simmers</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/posterity/#comment-35827</link>
		<dc:creator>George Simmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1551#comment-35827</guid>
		<description>Read &#039;The Old Wives&#039; Tale&#039;, an amazing novel. You will not be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read &#8216;The Old Wives&#8217; Tale&#8217;, an amazing novel. You will not be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posterity by lola</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/posterity/#comment-35825</link>
		<dc:creator>lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1551#comment-35825</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bennett still seems to me the most under-appreciated of British novelists.&quot; Oooh - which one to start with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bennett still seems to me the most under-appreciated of British novelists.&#8221; Oooh &#8211; which one to start with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posterity by Splendeur et décadence : où est donc passé John Galsworthy? &#171; Brumes</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/posterity/#comment-35765</link>
		<dc:creator>Splendeur et décadence : où est donc passé John Galsworthy? &#171; Brumes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1551#comment-35765</guid>
		<description>[...] Galsworthy hot, James Joyce not The Guardian, 26 octobre 2009 et Posterity, de George Simmers, 12 octobre [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Galsworthy hot, James Joyce not The Guardian, 26 octobre 2009 et Posterity, de George Simmers, 12 octobre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posterity by Roger</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/posterity/#comment-35668</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1551#comment-35668</guid>
		<description>http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/oct/26/how-our-literary-tastes-change for Guardian&#039;s own comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/oct/26/how-our-literary-tastes-change" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/oct/26/how-our-literary-tastes-change</a> for Guardian&#8217;s own comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posterity by The Sunday Papers &#124; Rock, Paper, Shotgun</title>
		<link>http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/posterity/#comment-35653</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sunday Papers &#124; Rock, Paper, Shotgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/?p=1551#comment-35653</guid>
		<description>[...] I found this fascinating. Poll results from Guardian readers of what authors they thought posterity would remember. From the 1920s. They were, shall they say, well off. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found this fascinating. Poll results from Guardian readers of what authors they thought posterity would remember. From the 1920s. They were, shall they say, well off. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
